2026 Practitioner Quick Answer: In a "Subject-To" rental purchase, the buyer holding the recorded deed and bearing the benefits and burdens of ownership claims 100% of MACRS and cost segregation deductions. Under IRC Section 167, Helvering v. F. & R. Lazarus & Co., and Grodt & McKay Realty, Inc. v. Commissioner, the former seller still named on the note claims $0. Under Crane v. Commissioner, 331 U.S. 1 (1947), your depreciable cost basis includes the full unpaid mortgage balance taken subject-to plus cash paid. Deeding a property into an investor LLC is not exempt from due-on-sale acceleration under the Garn-St. Germain Act (12 U.S.C. 1701j-3(d)). Leaving the seller's HO-3 homeowner policy active also creates an insurable-interest gap that requires binding a DP-3 landlord policy (benchmark rates with Insurance AI).

Subject-To Deal DimensionBuyer (Recorded Deed & Equitable Owner)Seller (Still Named on Promissory Note)Governing Authority
MACRS & Cost Seg DepreciationClaims 100% of building & 5/15-year depreciationClaims $0 after transfer dateIRC Sec. 167(a), Pub. 527, Grodt & McKay (77 T.C. 1221)
Unadjusted Cost BasisCash paid + closing costs + unpaid Subject-To debtRelieved debt counts in IRC Sec. 1001 sale proceedsCrane v. Commissioner (331 U.S. 1), IRC Sec. 1012
Mortgage Interest DeductionDeductible on Schedule E Line 13 as equitable owner$0 for payments funded by the buyerTreas. Reg. 1.163-1(b) (attach explanation statement)
Due-on-Sale ExposureInvestor LLC / trust assignment is actionable by lenderLoan acceleration affects seller credit if unpaid12 U.S.C. 1701j-3(b) & (d), Fannie Mae D1-4.1-02
Hazard & Liability PolicyFirst Named Insured on new DP-3 landlord policyAdditional Insured / Interest (liability only)Insurable interest doctrine + ISO Standard Mortgagee Clause

1. Who Claims Depreciation in a Subject-To Transfer?

Buyers and sellers in creative finance transactions frequently guess wrong about who owns the tax deductions once the deed records. Because the loan servicer still mails annual Form 1098 statements with the seller's Social Security Number, some sellers keep depreciating the house on Schedule E by mistake. That filing position fails an IRS examination immediately.

Federal tax depreciation follows economic substance and beneficial ownership instead of the name printed on the bank's promissory note. Under IRC Section 167(a), IRC Section 168, and IRS Publication 527, depreciation belongs exclusively to the taxpayer who suffers capital exhaustion of the building. In Helvering v. F. & R. Lazarus & Co., 308 U.S. 252 (1939), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that depreciation follows economic burden even when title or loan papers name another party. Four decades later, Frank Lyon Co. v. United States, 435 U.S. 561 (1978) affirmed that multi-party real estate financing retains tax recognition when grounded in genuine economic obligations.

When the IRS audits a Subject-To deed, wraparound mortgage, or land contract, examiners apply the eight-factor Benefits and Burdens test from Grodt & McKay Realty, Inc. v. Commissioner, 77 T.C. 1221 (1981).

Grodt & McKay FactorStandard Subject-To Rental ClosingTax Ownership Signal
1. Passage of Legal TitleSeller executes and records a warranty or grant deed to buyer or buyer's LLCPoints to Buyer
2. Treatment by the PartiesPurchase contract, settlement statement, and servicing agreement treat transfer as a salePoints to Buyer
3. Equity AcquisitionBuyer captures principal paydown and market appreciation above the existing notePoints to Buyer
4. Present ObligationsSeller is obligated to deliver deed; buyer is contractually obligated to service paymentsPoints to Buyer
5. Right of PossessionBuyer holds exclusive possession and leases the property to tenantsPoints to Buyer
6. Property Tax LiabilityBuyer pays county property taxes directly or funds the servicer escrow accountPoints to Buyer
7. Risk of Loss or DamageBuyer bears casualty repair costs above insurance proceedsPoints to Buyer
8. Operating & Sale ProfitsBuyer collects all gross rents and keeps net resale proceedsPoints to Buyer

Once those benefits and burdens shift at closing, the seller must report a disposition (compare installment and seller-financing exit rules) and halt all depreciation. Under Treas. Reg. 1.163-1(b), the Subject-To buyer deducts the mortgage interest actually paid as equitable owner even without personal liability on the note. Because the bank's Form 1098 carries the seller's SSN, buyers report that interest on Schedule E, Part I, Line 13 ("Other interest") with a statement naming the servicer, address, and payment total.

2. Crane Basis, At-Risk Limits & Cost Segregation Eligibility

A common myth claims that paying only $25,000 in cash entry costs limits your depreciable basis to $25,000. In Crane v. Commissioner, 331 U.S. 1 (1947), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled under the predecessor to IRC Section 1012 that "property" acquired subject to an unassumed mortgage includes the full principal balance of existing debt in initial cost basis. Under Estate of Franklin v. Commissioner, 544 F.2d 1045 (9th Cir. 1976), total acquisition debt still cannot artificially exceed fair market value.

Suppose you acquire a single-family rental after January 19, 2025 by paying $30,000 cash, $5,000 in closing fees, and taking title subject to a $365,000 first mortgage. Your unadjusted cost basis is $400,000. Subtracting a 20% land allocation ($80,000) leaves $320,000 of depreciable building basis.

Quick Year-1 Depreciation & Safe Harbor Estimator

Pick a preset or adjust 2 inputs to compare Year-1 deductions instantly.

Estimated Year-1 Deduction & Tax Reduction (at 37%)
$87,864.96 Write-Off · $32,510.04 Tax Savings
Baseline without optimization: $6,304 in Year 1. Assumes 26% 5 & 15-year reclassification with 100% bonus (post-Jan 19, 2025 acquisition) vs 27.5-yr straight-line (June mid-month).
Model Full Property Free

In Modern CFO Cost Segregation Planning Benchmarks (v2026.1.0, CC BY 4.0), single-family residential rentals typically reclassify 18% to 28% of building basis into 5-year and 15-year MACRS buckets. Reclassifying 24% of that $320,000 basis ($76,800) on a post-January 19, 2025 purchase from an unrelated seller qualifies for 100% bonus depreciation in 2025 and 2026 under IRC Section 168(k) and Public Law 119-21 Section 70301. By contrast, property acquired under a written binding contract entered before January 20, 2025 and placed in service in 2025 receives the 40% phase-down rate.

Before deducting that $76,800 paper loss, verify the IRC Section 465 At-Risk limitation on Form 6198. Cash invested ($35,000) is always at-risk. Unassumed Subject-To debt counts as Qualified Nonrecourse Financing under IRC Section 465(b)(6) only when borrowed from a "qualified person" in commercial lending (such as a bank or agency lender). Disqualifying seller-financed wrap taint under Section 465(b)(6)(D)(ii) breaks that safe harbor. When a non-bank seller wraps an underlying note into a private seller-carried wraparound mortgage, Form 6198 may suspend deductions above your cash down payment until principal is paid down.

3. Garn-St. Germain Act (12 U.S.C. 1701j-3): Why Investor LLCs Are Not Exempt

Seminar promoters routinely claim that transferring a mortgaged house into a "land trust" hides or legally blocks the lender's due-on-sale clause. Federal statute says the exact opposite. Under the Garn-St. Germain Depository Institutions Act of 1982 (12 U.S.C. 1701j-3(b)), lenders hold a federally preemptive right to enforce due-on-sale acceleration clauses (typically Paragraph 18 of the uniform security instrument). That trigger applies whenever real property or any interest in it transfers without prior written lender consent.

12 U.S.C. 1701j-3(d) lists nine statutory exemptions for residential property with fewer than five dwelling units, such as transfers at death, transfers to a spouse or children, and short-term leases under (d)(4). Neither investor LLCs nor third-party trust sales qualify under those exemptions.

  • Inter Vivos Trust Limit (12 U.S.C. 1701j-3(d)(8) & 12 C.F.R. 191.5): Exempts a living-trust transfer only while the original borrower "is and remains a beneficiary" and occupancy rights do not transfer. Once the seller assigns beneficial interest to an investor and vacates, (d)(8) protection vanishes.
  • LLC Transfers & Fannie Mae D1-4.1-02: Business entities receive zero protection under Garn-St. Germain. Even Fannie Mae Servicing Guide Section D1-4.1-02 (for loans acquired on or after June 1, 2016) permits LLC transfers only when the original borrower retains majority ownership. Deeding a Subject-To rental into a buyer's asset protection LLC remains an actionable technical default, requiring cash reserves or a DSCR refinance backup plan.

4. Seller HO-3 vs. Buyer DP-3 Landlord Insurance & Mortgagee Clauses

Leaving the seller's existing HO-3 homeowner policy active to avoid alerting the loan servicer's escrow department is the costliest mistake in Subject-To investing. If a fire or windstorm destroys the rental after closing, the carrier's Special Investigations Unit pulls county deed records and denies the dwelling claim on two grounds.

  1. Lack of Insurable Interest: Property insurance indemnifies financial loss owned at the time of loss. Once the seller conveys the deed, the seller no longer owns structure equity, while the buyer LLC is a legal stranger to the seller's HO-3 contract.
  2. Occupancy & Rental Hazard Misrepresentation: An ISO HO-3 policy underwrites an owner-occupied residence. Converting the house into a tenant-occupied rental without rewriting coverage onto a DP-3 (Dwelling Fire Special Form) landlord policy triggers occupancy exclusions and leaves landlord liability uninsured.

To protect your equity and your tenants alongside the lender's collateral, bind a replacement DP-3 Replacement-Cost Landlord Policy at closing and benchmark rates with Overline Insurance AI.

DP-3 Policy RoleExact Party to ListLegal & Loss-Settlement Purpose
First Named InsuredBuyer (or Buyer's Title-Holding LLC)Aligns the insurance contract with recorded deed ownership and insurable interest; controls policy endorsements and dwelling/loss-of-rents claim checks.
Mortgagee / Loss PayeeExisting Loan Servicer (with exact loan number)Under the ISO Standard Mortgagee Clause, creates an independent contract protecting the lender's lien up to the unpaid balance and prevents costly lender force-placed insurance.
Additional Insured (Liability)Former Seller (Original Borrower)Extends premises-liability defense if an injured tenant sues everyone appearing in county mortgage history, without giving the seller any claim to property-damage checks.

Yes, delivering a new DP-3 declarations page to the servicer's insurance center reveals a new Named Insured. Operators weigh manageable acceleration risk against the certainty of an unpaid $350,000 fire loss on an invalid seller HO-3 policy. Ensure Coverage A reflects full Replacement Cost Value (RCV) rather than Actual Cash Value, and review our guide on cost segregation and property insurance schedules.

Frequently Asked Questions: Subject-To Tax, Depreciation & Insurance

Q: Can both the Subject-To buyer and the original seller claim depreciation on the same house? A: No. Under IRC Section 167 and Grodt & McKay Realty, Inc. v. Commissioner (77 T.C. 1221), only the party holding beneficial tax ownership claims depreciation. Once the deed and possession transfer to the buyer, the seller must report a property sale and stop claiming Schedule E depreciation immediately.

Q: Does a Subject-To buyer get to depreciate the existing mortgage balance or only their cash down payment? A: Under Crane v. Commissioner, 331 U.S. 1 (1947), and IRC Section 1012, the buyer's initial cost basis includes both cash paid and the full unpaid principal balance of the existing mortgage taken subject-to (provided total debt does not exceed fair market value). Subtracting land value yields your depreciable building basis.

Q: How do I deduct mortgage interest in a Subject-To deal when Form 1098 has the seller's SSN? A: Under Treas. Reg. 1.163-1(b), a legal or equitable owner of real estate may deduct mortgage interest actually paid even without personal liability on the promissory note. Report the interest paid on Schedule E, Part I, Line 13 ("Other interest") and attach a statement listing the loan servicer, property address, and payment records.

Q: Does putting a Subject-To property into a land trust legally block the lender's due-on-sale clause? A: No. The Garn-St. Germain inter vivos trust exemption under 12 U.S.C. 1701j-3(d)(8) applies only while the original borrower remains a beneficiary and occupancy rights do not transfer. Assigning beneficial interest or occupancy to an investor or LLC removes statutory protection and permits lender acceleration.

Q: Should I just add my LLC as an Additional Insured on the seller's existing homeowner policy? A: No. Adding an investor LLC as an Additional Insured on a seller's owner-occupied HO-3 policy only extends narrow derivative liability coverage and does not cure the seller's lost dwelling insurable interest or tenant-occupancy exclusions. Bind a dedicated DP-3 landlord policy naming the buyer/LLC as First Named Insured, the lender under the Mortgagee Clause, and the seller as Additional Interest/Insured for liability.


See Your Property's Tax Savings

Drop your address. The AI estimates your depreciation savings in 60 seconds, backed by a certified engineer study.

Overline Property AI● Live
Overline AI

Free cost segregation estimate, engineer-certified studies, and ongoing depreciation tracking.
Backed by $1B+ in supported tax depreciation.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, accounting, or insurance advice. Subject-To transfers carry due-on-sale acceleration and state-specific creative-finance regulatory risks; consult qualified real estate legal counsel, a licensed CPA, and a commercial insurance broker before transacting.